Protocol-level clarity for identity

Identity as a personal ownership space.

CustosVeritas treats identity as something you carry, not something a platform keeps. Services receive context-specific, provable statements, not full profiles.

We share the documents on request to keep distribution intentional.

Core separation
  • OwnershipWhere identity lives
  • TruthWhat is valid
  • PresentationHow it feels
  • ToolingHow it is edited

Mission

Digital identity is effectively platform-bound. CustosVeritas sketches a protocol mindset that restores agency by design.

Problem

Users are guests in other people's systems. This creates lock-in, opaque permission sprawl, and a power asymmetry around profiles and relationship graphs.

Core claim

Identity should be a personal ownership space. Services receive only what a context requires as provable statements, not raw data dumps.

Principles of restraint

Architecture of limitation, not persuasion.

Minimal disclosure

Default is a true/false statement like "over 18" or "authorized," not a full profile.

Revocation over permanence

Statements can expire or be revoked; exposure is not assumed to be permanent.

Replaceable tools

Clients and editors are interchangeable. The person's order remains their own.

Architecture at a glance

A layered model: crypto core as TCP/IP, roles and statements as HTML, order and visual description as CSS, clients as browsers.

Clients (replaceable)
Order / visual description (portable)
Roles & statements (meaning)
Crypto core (truth)

Explicit non-goals

  • No central identity provider or mandatory official app.
  • No platform accounts as the root of identity.
  • No social profiling, ranking, or engagement loops.
  • No hidden telemetry by default.
See full guardrails

Showcase: MatchVote

MatchVote is referenced as a showcase application, not the product itself. Details are shared on request.

View showcase note